
|
The former Board members and the core active Keepers of the Moscow Group Presents "Expose the Truth 1: History" 1. Letter of November 23, 2003 |
|
From: "Judy Sue Christenson" [JudySue@ChristIM.org] To: [Undisclosed-Recipient] Subject: From Moscow Keepers Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:36:02 -0600 Dear friends of Light, Greetings from Moscow, Russia! You know us mainly from the two letters "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" and "Lightbearers of the World Unite!" as well as the many letters written by the Church leadership about the events that took place on and followed the August 29th meeting in Moscow. These events raised a lot of questions that still remain unanswered till this date. The many hundreds of Keepers, who signed the Petition in Defense of the former Moscow Board, expressed their great desire for an open hearing of what had happened in Russia and why. The due process could surely shed light on the events that took place, but such an opportunity was not granted. We say a BIG THANK YOU to all those, who responded on our "Lightbearers of the World Unite!" letter, who signed the Petition, and who cared for Russian Keepers. We tangibly felt the hearts love of many of our brothers and sisters all over the world, with whom we are one on the inner despite the physical distance. The Board of the Moscow Group started to sound the alarm long before the actual events took place. On August 13 they sent the long detailed letter "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" to the Board of Directors and Council of Elders, where they described the situation, gave "a forewarning of the serious negative consequences of the actions that the Moscow Board was about to make under intense pressure" from the RHQ. The Moscow Board foretold the course of events and pleaded with Church leadership for help and timely intercession, but did not receive one single word of response from RHQ to their letter prior to the August 29th meeting. The Moscow Board was not able to discuss its concerns during the meeting. It did not succeed in improving their communication with Church leadership after the meeting either. After the August 29th meeting the Moscow Board had one single request to the Board of Directors of CUT/TSL: to hear the story of the Moscow Board first and then to make their judgment. But the Church Board agreed to speak with us only after we fulfilled their three requests (i.e. after the judgment has come down). But after fulfilling these three requests any meeting/speaking/communication/dialogue would be pointless at all. Why? In order to have dialogue, each party must be willing to listen to the other party. But the Church leadership a priory refused to hear us. For nearly three months our Board waited for the Church leadership to grant us the opportunity to explain our life, our country, our laws, our circumstances, our structure, our choices, our actions. But the judgment was pronounced without giving us that chance. The former Board members deeply regret that events had taken the turn they had during the August 29th meeting. Ketino apologized right during the meeting and now all of the former Board members want to apologize again and ask for forgiveness for any disharmony that took place during the meeting. We present our case before the Lords of Karma for adjudication and let God be our judge and our defense. We know that at least 600 people who signed the Petition want to hear our story so that they can make up their own mind about what happened here in Moscow. We do want to tell our story. We are willing to answer all your questions the ones that you already asked and the ones you will ask after reading our letters. The letters were written by the former Board members and the core active Keepers of the Moscow Group. We start with the history of our Group as it brings the understanding of the way TSL Study Groups were originally set up in Russia. Then we speak about the most recent events. We do not repeat the information given in the "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" and "Lightbearers of the World Unite!" letters. Thus you may wish to read them as well in order to get a more full picture. The former Board members and the core active Keepers of the Moscow Group Ketino L., Sergey S., Marina F., Margarita D., Sergei K., Nina K., Galina N., Tatiana D., Vera B., Oleg N., Marina A., Tatiana B, Vera S. |
|
EXPOSE THE TRUTH 1:
History The
birth of the Moscow Study Group. The Moscow Group started in November, 1994
when two people Eugene V. and Ketino L. agreed together to start "Saint
Germain's services", as they called it. Ketino had been working for a small medical company, where the members
of this company were interested in esoteric teachings and seeking spirituality.
The books of the Prophet's had come to their attention and the company
translated and published two books: "Chela and the Path" and "Saint Germain on
Alchemy". In autumn 1994, Mother had sent Paul Haugen with two more Keepers to
The readers of the books were calling to that
company to find out more about the books of the Prophet's and were invited to
the Saturday services. Within two weeks three women (Stella L. and two others,
who left soon afterwards) joined Eugene and Ketino. The following Saturday
another new person came El Morya and Saint Germain continued to send their
chelas the readers of the two published books to this little group and in
May 1995 there were already about 20 people coming to do decrees. They were
still doing the "Violet Flame 1" tape from the beginning to the end with no
explanations or Teachings, as there was nobody who could teach the Teachings in
this group. First Russians attend SU level 1. Mother was determined to bring the Teachings to the Russian lands and
thus 5 Russians, including Eugene, Ketino, Alexandra Sh. and two others, who
later left the Teachings, were invited to the Ranch to study the Teachings.
They arrived at the Ranch at the end of May and were taught daily by Nelly
Tsuru, for one month before the Summer conference, the ABC's of the Teachings.
After the conference they attended SU level 1 and at the end of SU, Ketino and
Eugene were asked to be the co-leaders of the Moscow Unchartered Group.
First steps of the Unchartered Study Group. After returning to December 1995 First Group test. New people continued to come and the Group grew. At the end of December
1995, Ketino went to Looking back on these events we can say that we
passed it somewhat easily, even though April 1996 First KOF Lessons in Russian. In April 1996 we started translating and
distributing the Xerox copies of KOF lessons amongst the members of the
In summer 1996, Ketino with three other Russians,
went to November 1996, First Russian Class. For the first time the lightbearers of
Russia desperately needed teachers/lecturers the
people who knew the Teachings and were eager to work day and night in order to
fulfill the spiritual needs of Russians, who were awakened by the books (by
that time three most important books "The Chela and the Path", "Saint Germain
on Alchemy"
and "The Science of the Spoken Word" were already translated and printed in
Russian) and were now doing the first steps in practicing the Teachings. We
needed these trained lecturers here in
Christmas Eve, 1996 First Live Dictations in
December 1996 Chartered Study Group. The rules at
that time dictated that in order to be on the phone patch we had to be a
chartered study group. Thus at the beginning of December we sent to RHQ a
request to be chartered along with the applications of the potential Board
members, explaining that the chartering had to be done quickly, so that we
could participate in the upcoming conference. The first seven KOF lessons had
already been translated and given to the members of the Group. The Keepers then
wrote the second letter to Saint Germain and thus many members of the Group
became lesson 8+ Keepers, which allowed us to form the Board of the chartered
group. In the middle of December we received a fax that we had become chartered
and were now the TSL Study Group of 1997 A Year of Growth and Acceleration. The year 1997, when Stuart and Susanne were in While the March 1997 Russian Easter Class. In March 1997 we conducted a five-day Teaching
Class and Easter phone patch conference attended by representatives of
dozens of Russian cities. Europeans once again came to help us. Along with the
Masters Teachings given to all attendees, there were three different courses
run simultaneously: 1)
for the group leaders (lead by Stuart and
Ketino) 2)
on Montessori (lead by Marius van Dorp from
3)
on macrobiotic diet (lead by Stig Vesturland
from Discipline of the We taught the people how to set up a Study
Group, how to be an effective decree leader, how to make and run services, key
Teachings that leaders needed to understand and present to their groups
including essential calls and dispensations, how to deal with psychicism etc.
Finally all the people coming to Publishing House Started.
The small publishing company that originally printed the Prophet's books was
closed. The books were out of print and the Keepers in the Moscow Group decided
to register an organization for publishing the books. The translators
and the editors in this publishing company were and still are Keepers (as it is
important to understand the subject that one translates), but other types of
work for the company (such as layouts, covers, printing process etc.) were
often done by non-Keepers. The work and success of the Moscow Study group was
and is very much dependent on the work and success of the publishing company
and vice-versa. Effective System of Publishing and Teaching. Russians traditionally love to read. Every
second person you see in the metro or in the bus is reading. We do not have
illiteracy in our country (by God's grace) and nearly all the people in
1997 First SU Class in Since 1997 Teaching Classes have been held
every year or even twice a year. The retreats were attended by as many as 500
people, the Classes in Unofficial Spring 2000 Over 20 Study Groups Chartered. In 1999 Ketino sent to RHQ a number of
requests from Russian-speaking groups to supply them with some forms and norms
that would allow them to be chartered. She was given the understanding that the
norms were in the process of being changed Finally Ketino suggested the
adoption of the three-page document, that was written based on the
administrative manual. It contained the goals of the TSL study group, the
requirements for the group and for the Board and the procedure of elections.
The RHQ representative for March 2000 Autumn
2000 Disagreement Over A. Blumenschein. The second disagreement was in
autumn 2000, when Neroli Duffy spoke for more than an hour on the phone with
Ketino, trying to convince her to change her opinion about Andrew Blumenschein.
Ketino did not agree with Neroli's judgment. The fact is that many Russians
know Andrew personally, as he conducted in
January
2001 Disagreement Re: April SU Class. The third disagreement was between
the Moscow Board and the team from the Ranch. According to an agreement made in
the Summer of 2000 Kate Gordon, Peter and Neroli Duffy were to conduct the SU
Class in April 2001, that was to be 10 days long and include Maitreya's Seminar
and the SU series on "Understanding Yourself". At the end of December the
agreements were confirmed via e-mail and the announcements were already made
during the New Year's conference, but on January 10th Kate and Neroli informed
us on the phone about the changes they wanted to make in the format and the
context of the Class. They said they could not bring Maitreya's Seminar and
could come just for 3-4 days instead of 10 days. They also said, that they will
only bring a few lectures on "Understanding Yourself" instead of the whole
series, though they knew the book "Understanding Yourself" was planned to be
released by the date of the Class and these were the first lectures on
psychology for Russians. We explained that the Teaching Class is the
spiritual event that the people are waiting for and preparing for during the
whole year by saving up their money, using their annual vacation, some of them traveling
3-4 days one way just to come to Moscow, sending the representatives of the
groups so that they can bring the Teachings they learned to their cities. We
explained the needs of Russians and the importance of giving a good portion of
Teachings during this Class as it is the only time and place in a year the
people can get it. But Kate and Neroli responded with some interesting
statements, for example: "It does not matter what Teachings we bring to
January 2002 Ranch Begins Its Reformation of the Moscow Group. The formerly good working relationship and
understanding between Kate-Neroli-Peter and the At the time the second
elections were taking place in In his first letter to the new Board on 2002,
Another Year of Growth. 2002 was very fruitful for the Moscow Group. After
living for 4 years in New Zeeland Stuart and Susanne returned to
Also a Year of Russian Opposition. It was not surprising for us that along with the Victories we had
plenty of opposition to the Masters' work. Where there is a great Light there
always comes Darkness to oppose that Light. Right after the May Class we were
kicked out of the venue we had for services and had to find a new one, though
the venue was prepaid through the end of June. In October, as soon as the book "Climb
the January
2003 Meetings at RHQ. At the end of January Ketino came to the Ranch to
attend the annual Elder's meeting. She also had a number of meetings with the
leadership of the organization. On January 29 at During the meeting Linda said that she plans to
come to Then they had
conversation for a few hours where Ketino explained in detail about the
differences between the ways
A few days later during a break in Elder's meeting
Ketino had a similar conversation with Kate Gordon, explaining why Kate is not
invited to come to the Moscow Group. SU team plans the trip to In the beginning of March Peter wrote a letter to
the Dnepropetrovsk Group, asking if they would like to have him and Neroli to
come to hold a short seminar in
The Moscow Group members were busy preparing
their own big annual Teaching Class and were not involved in the preparations
of Peter and Neroli's trip to Russia and Ukraine, except Olga P., who offered
them help with visas, travel and accommodation arrangements (she was not
involved in the activities of the Moscow Group and even hardly attended the
services in the past two years). The letter "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"
gives a lot of factual material and quotes from the e-mails between
headquarters and the Board of the Moscow Group during this year. This letter
will just add more facts and correspondence that happened this Summer before
the August 29 meeting and in preparation to it in order to help you better
understand where we all were by August 29. A New Milestone: The May Retreat 2003. The two-week May Retreat 2003 was no doubt under El Morya. We had
Mother's/El Morya's "Community" lectures with quite a few dictations of El
Morya (including the "benched" and "unbenched" ones). We also played the whole
1993 Easter conference dictations (Class of Elohim), that was a very new and
profound experience for Russians, who did not have a chance to attend such
conferences with Mother in the past. Tom and Celeste Miller, Alex and Margaret
Reichardt were invited as guests to the Class. We believe, these were truly the
right/best people, who could share their personal experience of living in
Community and participating in building the Community, that Mother was speaking
about in her lectures. Thank you Tom and Celeste, Alex and Margaret, we were
truly blessed to have you here in The written response from Peter
Duffy on May 13 on this fact was: "I just learned that you invited four people
from 1) &nb
sp;
some
people in the 2) &nb
sp;
those in
RHQ, who wanted the power and control over The desires of these two groups
of people could be easily fulfilled when one group is appointed by the other. The questions to ask
about the people in the Moscow Group that were not happy with the work of the
Board and the activities of the Group are: Who were they? What were they
complaining about? How many people were in that complaining group? The
Orchestration of the Complainers. One could be surprised, but the whole
scenario of the opposition in the Group was orchestrated throughout the years
by one single person Alexandra Sh. (A.Sh.) From the first year of existence
of the Group she did attract to her all the complaining people, no matter what
they were unhappy about. She was artfully playing on the different problems
small and big, that burdened the people at any particular moment by pointing
the finger at the Board as the source of the problem/burden/inconvenience.
These "problems" ran the gamut of: the decrees are too loud/the decrees are too
soft; too many decrees are in English/too many decrees are in Russian; it is too
cold in the venue/it is too hot in the venue; the services are too early/the
services are or too late; the venue is too far from metro; the absence of
permanent focus (and thus the altar, equipment, chairs have to be set up for
each service); the absence of macrobiotic food or Montessori Teachings; the
absence of a bookstore owned by the Group; the absence of the registered
religious organization and so on and so forth. Generally the complainers
focused on "what was not" and not on "what can I do". A.Sh. complained about
the published books as well: either the size of the book was wrong, or the
cover was not good enough, or the amount of books sold was poor. In fact any
Victory in the Group was turned by her into defeat. When 10.000 books sold, she
could complain why not 20.000, when 100.000, why not 200.000, etc. A young couple Rauf and
Natalia who went with A.Sh. to A.Sh. visited quite a few
groups (some of them two-three times) in different parts of
Why do the people tend to
listen to and believe A.Sh.? First of all she is a masterful speaker. She is
also one of the eldest members of the Group. She was the chief translator and
editor of the books for many years, which explains her knowledge of the
Teachings. Her good deeds as the translator of the books, the knowledge of the
Teachings, the masterful skill to speak well/nice and the beautiful promises to
change the life for the better attracted through the years many people,
especially among the new seekers. One can hardly find a person in the Moscow
Group (including the Board members) who did not go through some tests with
A.Sh. By God's grace for the majority this influence was just for a time. Some
people felt that something was wrong with her sweet words by their heart
discernment. Many needed time sometimes months, sometimes years in order to
see the fruits/deeds of the "doers" versus the "talkers" and recognize the
Truth. Some are still caught in her nets, but by God's Grace these people were
and are in the vast minority. This Summer A.Sh. organized a trip of a group
of Russian Keepers to Future big changes in September are anticipated. During the Summer conference Natalia K. from
Rybinsk approached Ketino and expressed a big concern about what she was told
by Valdemar, a member of the Moscow Group. Valdemar was in favor of the
official registration of the Church in RHQ
team increases. The SU team was growing. In June there were already five
people, who planned to come to
Right after the July
conference Benuard spoke with Alexandra T. (A.T.) from
On July 23 in his
conversation with A.T. from Dnepropetrovsk Benuard mentioned how wonderful was
the team of people from
It was not surprising
that the two people from that team, who were at the Ranch and expressed
concerns about the Moscow Group Andrei and Julia became appointed Board
members. One other new Board member appeared to be Julia's Mother Olga, who
organized the trip of the SU team to All of this shows that those who were at the
Ranch, those who expressed "concerns", those who invited the ministers to
Moscow, are the same people who are now appointed at the new Board.
RHQ Creates a Problem in Order to Provide the Solution. On July 12 Peter Duffy wrote to the
Board: "This purpose of this letter is to let you know
about some of the requirements for the chartered study groups that are included
in the bylaws that study group operate under. In particular I want to let you
know about two reports that we ask study groups to send to headquarters each
year. I do understand that you have not been sending these to headquarters in
previous years. But we would like to begin receiving these reports from you
now. The first is the annual
report on the activities of the group in the previous year. The election
guidelines have a suggested outline for this report. I will also send you a
sample outline. It is not essential to follow this exact format, but we would
like to have a fairly comprehensive report of your activities. It is very
helpful to us in assessing our priorities at headquarters and our allocation of
resources to know what is happening in our different groups. The other report that is
required by the Study Group Bylaws is a financial report. The bylaws provide
for this to be forwarded to headquarters every three months, but we have
recently been asking only for annual reports. I will send you a copy of
recommended format for this report for 2002. If there are differences in
accounting principles and practices in
We are requesting that you send these two
reports for the year 2002 and also send them in future years as specified in
the bylaws and election guidelines". One can see from this letter that 1)
We were not required before to send these two
reports to RHQ. 2)
We never fulfilled the requirements of the
Bylaws they quoted. 3)
The leadership (whom Peter represented) knew
well that we were not sending these two reports and were not fulfilling the
requirements of the Bylaws and were in agreement with this through all the years
of our existence. 4)
The leadership has changed their mind about the
way we existed and operated all these years and was now demanding from us to
fulfill the rules that were written in the document that was never applicable
for the Moscow Group or any other group in Russian speaking lands. 5)
The leadership did not discuss with us if we
were capable to operate under these new rules. They did not tell us why they
changed the agreements we operated under through all years of our existence.
They just demanded us to do something that we are not capable of fulfilling in
our country. We were not fulfilling
some points of the Bylaws, not because we did not want to fulfill them, but
because we were not able to fulfill them. These two things: the laws of our
country and the Summit Lighthouse Study group Bylaws are incompatible. Back in
'95 and '96 when Mother was aware of the Russian situation and apparently more
aware of the long lasting influence of the communist ideology than the present
leadership, this situation was understood and RHQ was happy with the structure
we were building. During the intervening years until this past July, the
leadership appeared to show an understanding of what and why we were doing
things differently than in the
The Board responded to
Peter on July 20 that we will provide him with the required reports and
indicated our concern: "The only problem we see with the provision of such
reports is the security risk of mailing or e-mailing them. If these, or any
future reports from the study group (especially financial reports) will fall
into wrong hands then the group and its activities will be severely
jeopardized. We would like to suggest that we adopt the same practice that we
use for providing our regular financial reports to SU Press which is for
these reports to be physically delivered in person". That same day on July 20
Peter responded: "I do understand your concerns about the reports. Therefore
it will be fine to follow the procedures you have for your reports to SU Press.
Since we will be there at the end of August, this would be a good opportunity
for us to get these reports". In two days on July 22 he
wrote another letter requesting again the reports to be sent right away: "Kate
said she would like to receive the reports from
Ketino wrote a long
letter to Kate explaining the security issues, giving the examples of
persecution we were facing etc. At the end of her July 22 letter she wrote: "Each
time you have some idea about doing something in
Kate responded on July
24: "Thank you for sharing your concerns
about getting information to us. I am simply trying to make time to
read your documents and understand them before leaving for the trip to
Russia I/we are at a disadvantage in creative thought because we are ignorant
of what takes place there". Ketino wrote to Kate the same day: "It is very sad to hear that
you are "ignorant of what takes place". By their fruits ye shall
know them. You know us by our fruits. I have given many reports over the years
about what and how we are doing here". It was clear for our
Board that the leadership was not happy anymore with what, why and how we were
doing and with the way we have lived all these years and thus wanted to change
it. We sensed a problem. Olga
P. gives Ketino the forewarning. At the end of July Ketino spoke on the
phone with Olga P., who was appointed after the August 29th meeting
as a President of the Moscow Group. Olga was very negative about the activities
of the Group, including our recent May Class, that she did not attend herself.
Actually she hardly attended even our services during the last 2.5 years. Olga
said that she did not consider herself to be a member of the Group. She called
herself an observer, watching from outside what the Group is doing. At the end
of the conversation she said that it would be better if Ketino leaves the
position of leader by her free will, as she will be swept away by the tide/wave
anyway. Communications
and Events Leading Up to August 29. By August 10 we knew that Benuard was
going to stay in The Church leaders, who hired Benuard to work
in Russia, had a vision about what is the Moscow Group and what it is meant to
be and there was no place for our Board in this vision. If our
understanding was wrong and Benuard was going to work with us as Board
members for six months, why did not we plan this work together in the open?
It is a real blessing for any group to have one more person who is full time
working for the Teachings! And we know this well by our personal experience and
that is why we invited Stuart and Susanne to come and work in our Group.
Benuard could happily join our team if he wanted to work together with us. But
he did not share with us his plans, as if we were not the ones who would be
fulfilling these plans with him. The other explanation could be that the
Church leaders and Benuard knew beforehand that we would not support
these plans. Thus there was no need to discuss the ideas that we would be
either forced to manifest or we would have to get out of the way
of those who would be happy to manifest them. We knew neither the long
term plans, that the representative of headquarters was to fulfill in
"You have said that you would like to discuss future plans for the
Moscow Study Group. We would appreciate beforehand an agenda for this
meeting and details of your future plans. As you will only be in
On August 25 we got this response from
Linda: "Regarding the agenda, the organization's leadership has not met with
the As one can see from this
e-mail the leadership said very little about their plans and did not
indicate any concerns from their side. We had only written communication
with RHQ during the last three months before the August 29 meeting and thus we
can state as a fact, that we were not informed about any specific concerns
that the leadership had or wanted to discuss with us. There were only our
concerns that we voiced in the letter "Ignorance of the law is no excuse".
But our Moscow Board did not get any response on its letter. We did not get
even any single question from the Board of Directors about the events that on
August 16th, we warned would happen. The physical division and
destruction of the Moscow Group started on that day. It was initiated by the
Church leadership and could be stopped by them. Where the dialog was needed,
there was only a monologue a long letter "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"
from our side and silence from the other side. On our last Moscow Board
meeting in August Konstantin (the only Board member who was not dismissed from
his position, who had voted against the "Ignorance of the law" letter) asked
us: "Do you all know what had happened with the Board of the London Study
Group?" He warned us that this can happen with us also. We responded that
we all know that. On August 18 Ketino
received the e-mail from Jacqueline Millman: "Hi Ketino. We're trying to
reach you by phone and I've tried to call you several times this morning but
there was no answer " Ketino answered on August
19: "Dear Jacqueline, Please let me know who is requesting to speak to me
and what is the purpose of the call. The best way would be to e-mail me the
issue that needs to be discussed. Always Victory! Ketino". Jacqueline the same day: "Dear
Ketino, Thank you for responding. I just received your e-mail. Are you
available to have a phone meeting tonight, Tuesday, August 19th,
with Kate Gordon and Tina Storti regarding
Ketino spoke with the
Moscow Board members and they said that they want to be involved in any
discussion "regarding
"Dear
Jacqueline, The time you proposed
is not good for me, as it is night in
Always Victory
! Ketino" Jacqueline responded: "Dear
Ketino, Thank you for your response. Kate and Tina said that they will schedule
a meeting when they arrive, and they will talk to you when they get
there". The
place for the August 29th meeting. The first and the last
meeting the Moscow Board had was the August 29 meeting. The place for the
meeting also appeared to become a problem, though first it did not seem to be a
difficult issue. August 21, the Moscow
Board writes to Linda: "The Board of the MSG can meet you in your room at the
President Hotel, Friday August 29, at August 25, Linda writes
to us: "Dear Ketino and the
The next day the SU team
had another proposal: "Dear Ketino and the
The Board definitely did
not want to meet at office of Olga for the same reason why we did not want her
daughter Julia to translate for us (Note, that Olga became a President of the
newly appointed Board on August 30). The Board decided to
propose a venue that we used for our middle week services. On August 26 we
wrote: "Dear Linda, Our board would like to use another venue for our
meetings on Friday and Saturday We have now arranged a suitable venue for the
meeting at XX for Friday and Saturday between 12 and On August 27 we got a
positive response from Linda on our proposal: "Dear Ketino, I think the
meeting can be held on Friday at the XX at We wrote back: "Dear
Linda, One of our Board members will meet you at reception at the President
Hotel at 11.30 sharp for the The arrangements were
made, the agreement was reached, the SU team was on their way to
But Olga P. who was
making the visa, travel and accommodation arrangements for the SU team wrote us
a fax (in Russian), saying that we had to consult with her before we made the
arrangements. She did not like the place we have chosen and said that the
guests will not travel to the meeting via metro. We wrote back to Olga
asking to give the following message to the SU team: "Dear Linda and
members of the SU team, The Board of the MSG
has already rented a venue for the meetings. This is the venue that we use for
our mid-week services. We thought it would be interesting for you to see where
we meet as well as to have an altar for our meeting. This place has a free
entrance, and by God's grace we have never had any security issues while
attending this venue. We understand Olga's concern about travel via the Metro,
and thus we accept her offer to take you to the meeting via car. We will be
waiting for you at XX at One can
see from this correspondence that we did our best to meet the changing plans of
the SU team. Unfortunately after arriving in
The
last service of the Moscow Group as a whole. On August 21st the
Group lost it's venue for Saint Germain services. We had to quickly find some a
temporary venue as we were participating in the prayer vigil and had to
broadcast the service from A.T. wanted to know the
details of what is happening in Note, the Moscow Board
sent the letter to the Church leadership on August 13 and have waited till
August 29 for a response, but did not get any. Note also that it was
not our Group who made it public. From the very beginning we attempted to
work within the leadership communication structure (to the Church Board with
copy to Elders), but the leadership assumed that we were the ones, who
released the letter, as they have not given us a meeting where we could have
explained this. What was the
Age 6 years 8 month
old (chartered) KOF over
500 Average attendance on
a regular basis: -
Weekly
Saint Germain services 135 people -
Monthly
Surya services 175 people -
Quarterly
conferences 200 people -
Annual
Teaching Classes 500 people Note: The Moscow Group
has a different charter than US and other foreign groups: see the discussion at
the "December 1996 Chartered Study Group" heading above. The KOF Fraternity is
also set up in a different way, as the Keepers of Russian speaking nations are
not registered in What was TSL in
The Moscow Study Group
was a regional center for TSL in -
Age 6
years 8 month old -
" -
Territory
11 time zones -
KOF
about 4500 -
Chartered
Study Groups 27 -
Unchartered
Study Groups numberless numbers that we will not number Note: Again, the
charter under which groups operate in the Russian speaking nations is different
than the charter that applies to US and other foreign groups: see also the
discussion at the "Spring 2000 Over 20 Study Groups Chartered" heading above.
What was our
publishing house by August 29, 2003? -
Books
published 35 titles of SU Press, including "Climb the Highest Mountain",
"Science of the Spoken Word", "The Chela and the Path", "Saint Germain on
Alchemy" "Lost Years of Jesus", "The Human Aura", "Reincarnation: the Missing
Link in Christianity", "Lords of the Seven Rays", "Dossier on Ascension",
"Saint Germain's Prophecy for the New Millennium", "Kabbalah: Key to Your Inner
Power", "Messages from Heaven", "Understanding Yourself" etc. -
Books sold
700 000 copies in 6 years -
Video
over 15.000 tapes sold of Masters dictations with Russian subtitles and
Mother's lectures with voiceover -
Audio
over 20.000 tapes with decrees and songs sold -
Pictures
and focuses of the Masters (including the big altar sets) over 200.000 copies
sold -
KOF
lessons 1-26 lessons in Russian This letter was written by the former Board members and the core active
Keepers of the Moscow Group. |