The Historic Conjunction of the Gulf Oil Spill
Sunday, May 30, 2010, 10:53 AM PDT||
with the Homosexual Zealotry of the Democrat
Party Telegraphs Urgent Message to America
As Deepwater Horizon continues to pour
raw oil into the once pristine gulf, as the oil slick begins to visibly slime beaches, kill
birds, kill fish, kill dolphins, kill plankton, shutting down the sea food and fishing industry,
shutting down the tourist economy, throwing thousands of people out of work, posing a
fatal threat to this region's economy over the long term, indeed at the very same moment
that the waters of the Gulf are being turned into a chemical disperant soup likely to make
large swathes of the underwater world uninhabitable to living creatures, yes, even as the
stiuation is getting more and more desparate by the hour, what is the response of the
All of their creative juices are fanned up into
a great conflagration of bold and audacious activity to push through the homosexual
agenda in the very midst of what looks to be the greatest environmental disaster in
Yes, this unfolding environmental disaster
is the catalysts for their mindless enthusiasm in this area, where they say in their hearts,
now is the time to raise up the banner of homosexual virtue, yes, now. Now is the time
to wave that banner high. Now is the time to move quickly to dump thousands of tons of
moral sludge into that crystal pool that once represented the noble and pristine traditions
of America, by formulating and passsing a law that would force our military leaders to
allow homosexuals to serve openly in the United States Armed Forces.
Yes, these are
the two earth shaking items which TOGETHER graced the front pages of all newspapers
across the nation. The ongoing environmental disaster unfolding in the Gulf, and the
ongoing environemental disaster unfolding in the U.S. Congress.
Consider well the odor in the water that triggered
this burst of creative energy on behalf of the homosexual advocates in the U.S. Congress.
What do they smell? They smelled oil in the water. They smelled pollution. They smelled
a disaster in the making. And this is what fanned up their enthusiasm to defy the requests
of the military leadership to wait for their study to be completed, and to push through this
homosexual agenda now. There it is right on the record, and it cannot be erased.
Washington Post, Monday, May 24, 2010
Larger Image in New Window
Washington Post, Thursday, May 27, 2010
Larger Image in New Window
Washington Post, Friday, May 28, 2010
Larger Image in New Window
Yep, as the nation is being emotionally pulverized
under the weight of this unfolding environmental catastrophe, this is how the Democrat
Party spent their week.
You would think that having some interest in
the subject of public relations, there would have been some people in the Democrat Party
that would counsel the folly of moving on this subject at this time. But no. All of them
thought that this was the perfect time. All of their collective enthusiasm was gathered
up into a great conflagration of activity in this moment, in the moment of what looks
to be the worst environmental disaster in U.S. History.
Conjunctions always carry important messages.
And I pray the American people will heed this one. For example, that this is actually what
is behind the word "gay", a once pristine word which has itself been polluted beyond all
recognition. By pushing the homosexual agenda, the Democrat Party is like an oil well
out of control, pumping, and pumping, and pumping the sludge of moral depravity into
the body of water that represents the collective feeling world of America, creating thereby
the single worst environmental disaster in the history not just of this nation, but of the earth
itself. There will be death in those waters, not life.
After the failure of the recent effort to shut this
well down through the "top kill" technique, energy analyst Bryon King was quoted by
the Washington Post as saying, "This well is evil."
The question is, can this out of control gusher
of moral depravity be capped, or will it prove to be as stubborn as Deepwater Horizon?
May you pass every test.
and Corruption - Understanding
Sunday, May 30, 2010, 9:10 PM PDT||
the Congressman Joe
A very important question looms over the nation today,
as to whether members of the Abomey Administration, perhaps even Obama himself, are guilty of
corruption, indeed, in the commission of a federal crime, when they attempted to use the power and
resources of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government to lure Congressman Sestak (D-PA)
away from running against their man (incumbent) Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) in the recent
primary election for one of the two Pennsylvania U.S. Senate seats.
The first point that we should take into account in forming
our own conclusions in this area, is the fact that the laws of our nation are crafted in such a way as to
safeguard our fundamental constitutional structure, for example, that we have a government OF, BY,
and FOR the PEOPLE, where the authority and power vouchsafed to office holders in the Federal
Government, proceeds from the consent of the governed.
Federal Law is crafted to safeguard the sanctity of this principle
of consent, through the guarantee of free, and fair, elections.
The role of Federal Law is to shield this all-important electoral
process (and the principle of consent which it embodies) from various factors of corruption.
One factor that would corrupt the sanctity of the electoral process,
for example, would be for the holders of positions of power in the Federal Government to use that power to
influence who could run, and who could not run for office. If Federal office holders were allowed to use
the resources and the power of the Federal Government to influence elections, this would turn the principle
of consent on its head, where instead of the people deciding who will run for office, and who will
be voted into office, officials in the Federal Government would make that decision. As this would be a
corruption of our fundamental constitutional structure, federal law attempts to shield the process of free
and fair elections, and thus the sacred principle of the people's consent, against this factor of corruption.
This is the purpose of Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 29,
Section 600 of the U.S. Code (18 USC 600).
TITLE 18 - PART I - CHAPTER 29 - Section 600
Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation,
contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in
part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit,
to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support
of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or
special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or
political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
The PEOPLE put power in the hands of the Federal
office holders for specific purposes. The U.S. Constitution defines those purposes. For our
Constitutional system to work properly, officer holders need to stay within the proper bounds
in their use of the power and resources of the Federal Government. However, there are always
temptations to use the power and the perks of a Federal office beyond proper bounds. This is
a human weakness, one that needs to be checked and hemmed in by law. One of the most
serious temptations that Federal office holders face, is in using their power, which is the
people's power, to gain advantages for their own political party. The law, therefore forbids
Federal office holders from using the powers of their offices to enhance the power of their
own political parties in the specific ways defined in the code. And this includes using the
power of their offices to influence elections. The above law is intended to nip any
nefarious temptations in this direction, in the bud.
Now, when one compares the facts regarding the Sestak
Scandal, as we know them, to both the spirit and the letter of the law, as we know them, this appears
to be an open and shut case. The law was broken. The Obama Administration put 18 USC 600
over their knee like a dry twig, and snapped it in half.
In fact, the White House has publically admitted to a set
of facts that provide evidence that the law has been cleanly broken. And this is the more alarming,
that in setting these facts on the record, it appears to be the case that Obama's White House Counsel
apparently has not read the law, or if he has read it, he does not understand it. In this regard, on
Friday afternoon, May 28, 2010, Robert F. Bauer, White House Counsel, released a memorandum
on the Sestak affair. In the memorandum, he has placed on the record an admission to facts that
provide evidence of a conspiracy to violate the provisions of 18 USC 600, as follows:
".... We found that, as the Congressman has publicly and accurately stated, options for
Executive Branch service were raised with him. Efforts were made in June and July of
2009 to determine whether Congressman Sestak would be interested in service on a
Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board, which would avoid
a divisive Senate primary, allow him to retain his seat in the House, and provide him
with an opportunity for additional service to the public in a high-level advisory capacity
for which he was highly qualified. The advisory positions discussed with Congressman
Sestak, while important to the work of the Administration, would have been uncompensated."
Here is a direct admission placed on the record,
by Obama's White House Counsel, that there was a conscious and methodical conspiracy
within the White House itself, to use the resources of the Exectutive Branch as a carrot
to entice Congressman Sestak to withdraw from the Senate primary, in order to clear the field
for their man Arlen Specter. The partisan nature of the whole affair is clearly admitted on
the record, the intent being to gain an advantage for a particular political party. This is what
the law forbids, and makes into a crime. And the White House Counsel has set upon the
record an admission of a conspiracy to commit this crime.
Now, at the end of this memorandum, the White
House Counsel argues, basically, that EVERYBODY DOES IT.
" ... There have been numerous, reported instances in the past when prior Administrations --
both Democratic and Republican, and motivated by the same goals -- discussed alternative
paths to service for qualified individuals also considering campaigns for public office ..."
IF it is the case that "EVERYBODY DOES IT", then
this describes a situation of pervasive corruption in the Federal Government, and therefore, it would
be all the more important to use this opportunity, where you have caught a group of people red-handed
with their fists in the cookie jar, to make an example out of them, as an important and necessary
first step in sweeping this mind set of corruption out of the people's government.
Truly, members of the Obama administration are going
to begin looking very silly and hypocritical when they criticize President Karzai for the
corruption he supposedly puts up with in the Afghanistan Government, when President
Obama himself will not stand accountable for ridding his own administration of corruption
that has been publically admitted to.
May you pass every test.