|
Sunday, June 19, 2005, 11:09 AM PST |
 |
The
Teaching Exposes the Rebellion of
Church Manager Linda Worobec - No. 23
No Safety Outside the Ark of the Lord
As the concluding dictation during the 1985 Freedom
Conference, "Born Free to Love", held at Camelot, Beloved Chamuel and Charity gave us the
Ruby Ray Judgment call, which thereafter became decree 33.00 in our decree books. At the very
end of this decree, the Archangels gave us a very clear and unambiguous formula for dividing
the real from the unreal. This formula is as follows, and I will apply it, fruitfully, to Linda
Worobec's performance of a Beatles tune on the Altar of the Holy Grail, in King Arthur's Court,
on July 4, 2003.
Vol. 28 No. 39 - Chamuel and Charity - September 29, 1985 Born Free to Love
"Friend, how camest thou in hither
not having a wedding garment?"
VIII
The Mystery of Love
The Judgment of the Ruby Ray
. . . . .
Safety in the Ark of the Lord ! Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the Lord Christ in
every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love, in compassion,
in dignity. Safety in the ark of the Lord !
Safety in the ark of the Lord !
Safety in the ark of the Lord !
Come ye into the ark of the Lord !
Come ye, then, into the ark of Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark!
Come ye into the Shekinah Mother!
Come ye into the Light of Father!
Safety in the ark of the Lord .
Safety in the threefold flame.
Safety now in thy Christ and mine.
Safety in the I AM THAT I AM.
Safety in the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood.
Safety in the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood.
Safety in the ark of the Lord .
Safety in the Word.
. . . . .
[This dictation by Archangel Chamuel and Charity was the concluding address
delivered through the Messenger of the Great White Brotherhood Elizabeth Clare Prophet on
Sunday, July 7, 1985, at the Freedom conclave, Born Free to Love, held at Camelot. ]
|
|
|
This formula has the following elements, which I will
restate, in a numbered format.
1. Safety in the Ark of the Lord !
2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and
cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love, in compassion, in dignity.
3. Safety in the ark of the Lord !
4. Safety in the ark of the Lord !
5. Safety in the ark of the Lord !
6. Come ye into the ark of the Lord !
7. Come ye, then, into the ark of Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark!
8. Come ye into the Shekinah Mother!
9. Come ye into the Light of Father!
10. Safety in the ark of the Lord .
11. Safety in the threefold flame.
12. Safety now in thy Christ and mine.
13. Safety in the I AM THAT I AM.
14. Safety in the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood.
15. Safety in the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood.
16. Safety in the ark of the Lord .
17. Safety in the Word.
Next, we will juxtapose Linda Worobec's performance
of a Beatle's tune on the Altar of the Holy Grail, in King Arthur's Court, on the evening of July
4, 2003, to each element of this formula. Don't be intimidated by some of the repetition.
Everyone one of us will benefit from going through this exercise, in as much as we can place our
own actions into this formula, and thereby have a way to see more clearly, when we ourselves
are out-of-alignment, a state that must be swiftly corrected.
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within that sealed state of being? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Peformed the Beatles tune, was she
within that condition of being blesseded? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
being obedient to these three calls? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
inside of the Word? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Performed the Beatles tune, was she
within the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
In the right hand column, we see listed the state of
being that Linda Worobec was indulging at that point in time, in relationship to each element of
this formula. As you can see, there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows.
They are as follows: Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe.
Having performed her Beatles tune on the Altar of the
Holy Grail, Linda Worobec's testing was not finished. When challenged for this overtly
rebellious, disobedient, and unsafe behavior, in the immediate aftermath of the event, she had
the opportunity to confess her wrongdoing, to repent, to express a genuine spirit of contrition,
and to perform a penance, all of which were required to consume each of those seventeen
negative conditions of being listed there in the right hand column. The same formula can be
applied to evaluating her success in this next phase of testing, as follows.
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within that sealed state of being? Answer:
No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within that condition of being blesseded?
Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she being obedient to these three calls? Answer:
No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the threefold flame? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer:
No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the mantal of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the mantal of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she inside of the Word? Answer: No |
When Linda Worobec Initially Refused to Confess any
Wrongdoing in this situation, was she within the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What was the condition of her being at that point in time?
Unsafe |
In the right hand column, we see listed the state of
being that Linda Worobec was indulging at that point in time where she had the opportunity to
initially repent for her wrongdoing. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. They are as follows: Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice
Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Having performed her Beatles tune on the Altar of the
Holy Grail, and having been given an initial opportunity to repent of her wrongdoing, Linda
Worobec's testing was still not finished. She had many many months where the weight of that
fateful decision rested upon her shoulders. At any point in time, in the many months that have
thence passed, she had the opportunity to confess her wrongdoing, to repent, to express a
genuine spirit of contrition, and to perform a penance, all of which were required to consume
each of those seventeen negative conditions of being listed in the right hand columns of the two
preceding charts. The same formula can be applied to evaluating her success in this third
phase of testing, as follows.
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within that
sealed state of being? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within that condition
of being blesseded? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, is she being obedient to this
call? Answer: No |
|
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, is she being obedient to these
three calls? Answer: No |
|
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, is she being obedient to this
call? Answer: No |
|
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, is she being obedient to this
call? Answer: No |
|
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside of the
threefold flame? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside of her
own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of that Christ Reality? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside the
Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her inside of the
Word? Answer: No |
After 23 months of opportunity, as Linda Worobec Continues
to Refuse to Confess any Wrongdoing in this situation, does that place her within the
safety of the Word? Answer: No |
After 23 months, in what condition of being does she yet
reside? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of being that Linda Worobec is currently indulging as we
reach the end of a period of 23 months of opportunity to repent of her wrongdoing. As you can
see, in relationship to each point of the formula, there is not a positive report there in any of
those seventeen rows. They are as follows: Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe.
All of these terms are associated with a condition of
being in which the influences of the astral plane, which is to say the heavy breathing of the false
hierarchy play upon the mind and emotions, drawing the feet down paths which lead to soul
destruction.
These three charts, taken together, reveal exactly where
Linda Worobec is today. This analysis cannot be gainsaid. Linda Worobec's behavior in
relationship to each point of the formula given to us by Archangel Chamuel and Charity, is on
the public record. Holding each known point of behavior up to its corresponding element in the
formula, invokes an elemental and fundamental conclusion process within every illuminated
mind.
None of these conclusions are written in stone, at least
not yet. The freewill of the individual in question can reverse each one of these conclusions.
Has a particular behavior drawn the soul into an unsafe situation? Then let that soul take a step
back in the direction of safety. That is what repentance means. Although, we see in the world
of Linda Worobec a very powerful force that is yet keeping her from retracing her steps in
relationship to each point of this formula. And in this respect, there is a very significant problem
developing, when the individual embraces that resistance as their real self. This begins to meet
the definition of dweller-fusion, as opposed to Christ-Fusion, and the longer it goes on, the more
difficult it is to reverse.
Now, Linda Worobec is not the only person being tested
by this situation. Without a doubt, this situation has presented the leadership with many
important tests. And we can apply the foregoing formula to evaluate the degree to which the
leadership has passed those tests.
Leadership Test One - Linda Worobec, in
performing a Beatles Tune on the Altar of the Holy Grail, corrupted a very important tenet of the
Teaching. The Leadership had a choice to repudiate Linda Worobec's corruption, and to then
restore the integrity of the Teaching on that point. As noted below, the Great Divine Director
said, back in 1985, that "You ought to denounce the fallen angels
who purvey their rock music to steal from you by the syncopated beat the power of the
Kundalini." Linda Worobec's performance did not amount to a denunciation, but to a
statement of advocacy. This statement of advocacy had to be reversed, and it was the
Leadership's responsibility to reverse it. Yet, they refused to reverse it, rather, they came to the
support of Linda Worobec. The choice they made in this respect is on the public record, and we
can place that choice in juxtaposition to each element of the formula, as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in
relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended her Beatles Performance, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within that sealed state of being? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within that condition of being blesseded? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they being obedient to these three calls? Answer:
No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the threefold flame? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they inside of the Word? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to Officially Reverse Linda
Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the Beatles, but instead publically defended
her Beatles Performance, were they within the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being that the Leadership adopted in
relationship to test No. 1, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Leadership Test No. 2 - Each test that is failed,
and the chart directly above illustrates a failed test, is always followed immediately by another
test, and this is the test of confession, repentance, contrition, and penance. Here the soul is
given the opportunity to repair the damage, and step back into the domain of safety. As the
historical record testifies, the leadership refused to confess any mistake here, and thus, there was
no expression of repentance or contrition, and obviously there was no penance performed.
Again, we can fruitfully juxtapose their behavior in this respect, to each of the l7 elements of
Archangel Chamuel and Charity's formula, as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within that sealed state of being? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within that condition of being blesseded? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they being obedient to these three calls? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer:
No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer:
No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer:
No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer:
No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they inside of the Word? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, were they within the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What was the condition of their collective being at that point
in time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being that the Leadership adopted in
relationship to test No. 2, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Leadership Test No. 3 - After the initial test of
confession is failed, the student will immediately face a second test of confession and contrition,
but this test will be spread out over a period of time due to the additional layers of recalcitrance
with which the soul must deal. Here the soul must, over time, come to an understanding, that to
meet the requirements of the path, that the original failure required a statement of confession
and contrition, and the fact that the soul failed to make that statement of confession, this
represents a second failed test (as charted in the table directly above). Thus, the third test
requires the soul to make two statements of confession, contrition, and repentance. After an
appropriate period of time passes, this third test will be scored a failure. At this point we can
simply delineate the conditions of being which still obtain, related to the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula, as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within that sealed state of being? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within that condition of being blesseded? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently being obedient to these three calls? Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently being obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the threefold flame? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM?
Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood?
Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood?
Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the mantle of the Great White
Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer:
No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently inside of the Word? Answer: No |
After 23 months of Refusing to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to Reverse Linda Worobec's Statement of Advocacy in relationship to the
Beatles, expressing no contrition or repentance, nor agreeing to perform any penance, in regards
to this failure, are they presently within the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being which the Leadership finds itself in
today in relationship to test No. 3, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Leadership Test No. 4 - The collective
leadership has a responsibility to hold those in leadership accountable for gross acts of rebellion,
especially when those are committed on the Altar of the Holy Grail, in public, in front of
hundreds of Ascended Master students. All those in leadership today, have refused to fulfill this
responsibility. This is a profoundly important test, which they have failed. And we can
juxtapose their behavior in this regard, to the 17 points of Archangel Chamuel and Charity's
formula as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
that sealed state of being? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
that condition of being blesseded? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being
obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being
obedient to these three calls? Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being
obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being
obedient to this call? Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the threefold flame? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside of her own Christ Reality? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of that Christ Reality? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Reality of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of her own I AM THAT I AM? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the mantal of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the mantle of the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Ark of the Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they
inside of the Word? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to hold Church Manager Linda
Worobec Accountable for Her Act of Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within
the safety of the Word? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being which the Leadership finds itself in
today in relationship to test No. 4, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Leadership Test No. 5 - Each test that is failed,
and the chart directly above illustrates a failed test, is always followed immediately by another
test, and this is the test of confession, repentance, contrition, and penance. Here the soul is
given the opportunity to repair the damage, and step back into the domain of safety. As the
historical record testifies, the leadership refused to confess any mistake here, and thus, there was
no expression of repentance or contrition, and obviously there was no penance performed.
Again, we can fruitfully juxtapose their behavior in this respect, to each of the l7 elements of
Archangel Chamuel and Charity's formula, as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within that sealed state of being?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within that condition of being
blesseded? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to these three calls?
Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of the threefold flame?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the threefold
flame? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of her own Christ Reality?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of that Christ
Reality? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Reality of her own I AM
THAT I AM? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of her own I AM
THAT I AM? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the mantal of the Great
White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the mantle of
the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the mantal of the Great
White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the mantle of
the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of the Word? Answer:
No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Word?
Answer: No |
What was their collective condition of being at that point in
time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being that the Leadership adopted in
relationship to test No. 5, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
Leadership Test No. 6 - After the initial test of
confession is failed, the student will immediately face a second test of confession and contrition,
but this test will be spread out over a period of time due to the additional layers of recalcitrance
with which the soul must deal. Here the soul must, over time, come to an understanding, that to
meet the requirements of the path, that the original failure required a statement of confession
and contrition, and the fact that the soul failed to make that statement of confession, this
represents a second failed test (as charted in the table directly above). Thus, the third point of
testing (in a given situation) requires the soul to make two statements of confession, contrition,
and repentance. After an appropriate period of time passes, this third point of testing will be
scored a failure. At this point we can simply delineate the conditions of being which still obtain,
related to the 17 points of Archangel Chamuel and Charity's formula, as follows:
| 1. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 2. Blessed are ye when your discipleship unto the
Lord Christ in every Ascended Master and cosmic being is sealed, is retained in honor, in love,
in compassion, in dignity. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within that sealed state of being?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within that condition of being
blesseded? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsealed, and Unblessed |
| 3. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 4. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 5. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 6. Come ye into the ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 7. Come ye, then, into the ark of
Maitreya
And the ark of the covenant and the flame of the ark! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to these three calls?
Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Thrice Disobedient |
| 8. Come ye into the Shekinah
Mother! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 9. Come ye into the Light of
Father! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they being obedient to this call?
Answer: No |
|
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Disobedient |
| 10. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 11. Safety in the threefold
flame. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of the threefold flame?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the threefold
flame? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 12. Safety now in thy Christ and
mine. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of her own Christ Reality?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of that Christ
Reality? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 13. Safety in the I AM THAT I
AM. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Reality of her own I AM
THAT I AM? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of her own I AM
THAT I AM? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 14. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the mantal of the Great
White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the mantle of
the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 15. Safety in the mantle of the Great
White Brotherhood. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the mantal of the Great
White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the mantle of
the Great White Brotherhood? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 16. Safety in the Ark of the
Lord! |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside the Ark of the Lord?
Answer: No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Ark of the
Lord? Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
| 17. Safety in the Word. |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they inside of the Word? Answer:
No |
When the Leadership refused to confess any wrongdoing in
regards to their failure to hold Church Manager Linda Worobec Accountable for her Act of
Rebellion on the Evening of July 4, 2003, were they within the safety of the Word?
Answer: No |
What is the condition of their collective being at this point in
time? Unsafe |
Again, I would direct your attention to the right hand
column, where we see listed the state of collective being that the Leadership adopted in
relationship to test No. 6, as that test is juxtaposed to each of the 17 points of Archangel
Chamuel and Charity's formula. As you can see, in relationship to each point of the formula,
there is not a positive report there in any of those seventeen rows. The reports are as follows:
Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient,
Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe.
In relationship to all of the tests we have charted so far,
those related to Linda Worobec personally, and those related to the leadership's responsibility in
dealing with her rebellion, using the formula provided to us by Chamuel and Charity, we see that
their performance can be uniformly characterized as Unsafe, Unsealed and
Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe.
This tells you exactly what was behind the destruction
of the Unity of the Russian Congregation on August 29, 2003. All of these people had stepped
outside the safety of the Ark of the Lord. To step back into a condition of safety, they would
have had to retrace the exact same steps which took them out of that condition of safety, indeed,
if they were ever there, that is a questionable proposition.
From Linda Worobec's initial act of rebellion, you can
see how these qualities, Unsafe, Unsealed and Unblessed, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient, Unsafe, Unsafe,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe. expanded to encompass the
entire leadership. They were literally enfolded by a growing shadow. Clearly, horrible errors
were made in the Russian Situation, many tests failed, miserably failed, and they could all be
charted, with the exact same results, according to the formula given to us by Archangel Chamuel
and Charity. Given the fact that the bulk of these tests were failed on July 4, 2003, and shortly
thereafter, you can see that they were already outside the Ark of the Lord when they walked into
that meeting in Moscow, on August 29, 2003. The quality of spiritual "safety" was already far
from them at that point.
But, this is not the end of the testing. As leadership
succumbs to a growing shadow of corruption "There is a way which seemeth right unto
a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." the responsibility for restoring
integrity and honor to the life of the organization rests upon the shoulders of the rank and file
membership. And thus, they are tested as well. And those tests can also be charted according to
the formula given to us by Archangel Chamuel and Charity. And, unfortunately, the results of
those tests, delineated one by one, would show the same results, and therefore, the reader can see
how that cloud of corruption slowly encompasses an entire organization.
This scriptural passage (Proverbs 14:12) "There
is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death."
tells us that human beings have this ability, and a propensity to exercise it, to convince
themselves they are walking into the light, even when in fact, they are walking into a greater and
greater darkness. The Teaching given to us by Archangel Chamuel and Charity, this formula
that we have been using here, if the student would only use it, we would find that it would then
be very difficult to be tricked (deceived, deluded) into walking away from the sunlight of divine
being.
This organization cannot move forward until these
failures are resolved. The organization cannot move forward, when every test the leadership
takes, and the membership takes, when charted according to the formula given to us by
Archangel Chamuel and Charity, are these: Unsafe, Unsealed and
Unblessed, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Disobedient, Thrice Disobedient, Disobedient, Disobedient,
Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe, Unsafe.
The only way forward for us, is when our tests, charted
according to Archangel Chamuel and Charity's formula, produce these results: Safe, Sealed and Blessed, Safe, Safe, Safe, Obedient, Thrice Obedient, Obedient,
Obedient, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe. In other words, this organization
cannot move forward, until we collectively turn in exam sheets on the tests outlined here, that
can be graded by the Masters in this way: Safe, Sealed and Blessed, Safe,
Safe, Safe, Obedient, Thrice Obedient, Obedient, Obedient, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe, Safe,
Safe, Safe.
Now, every member of this organization can insert
their own tests into the formula given to us by Archangel Chamuel and Charity, and thereby, you
will understand quickly, whether you have passed or failed a particular test. And understanding
that, you can swiftly self-correct, as the Master El Morya requires. But make no mistake about
it. Every member of the organization must pass these Linda Worobec related tests, in as much
as this person holds the office of CHURCH MANAGER. These tests must be passed, before
other tests can be given.
May you pass every test. And don't forget to visit the
pearl while you are here.
Source URL
http://www.homewardboundjournal.com/daily_blogger.htm#06_19_2005_1
|