The Safety
of the Children
Requires a Public
Investigation
by Steven S. Showers, Editor
I take no pleasure in bringing this issue
again before the attention of this community. This is not a pleasant subject by any
means. But, it is clear to me that the safety of the children requires a public
investigation.
A prominent danger sign has been hoisted
before the eyes of our community by Monique Gulick, the editor of the "Darjeeling
Report", with her posing, photographing, and publication of the images of seven
naked children for public consumption.
It is very important to understand why
this is a danger sign, and why this is an indicator that there may be more of a
problem under the surface, yet hidden from our eyes, which would remain hidden,
to the detriment of our community, and especially to the detriment of innocent
and exploitable children, if we did not follow this up with a serious investigation
by the Board of Directors of this Church, and if they refuse to act, the Board of Trustees of the
Minneapolis Teaching Center.
Child molestation is at epidemic
proportions throughout our culture. In as much as our church draws its members
from the larger culture, we should not indulge any kind of denial, in regards to the
possibility that such momentums could enter into this congregation, and this is
especially true against the backdrop of the pedophilia scandals that have so recently
rocked the Catholic Church. And this is the more true, when the first danger signs
have now become clearly visible within our own community.
In my (limited) research into the phenomena
of pedophilia, I have found that one of the ways pedophiles can get children to relax, and
into a position where they can be molested with the least amount of resistance, and
even a spirit of cooperation, is to get them comfortable posing naked before a
camera. The idea is to break down what ever self-defense mechanisms they have
in this regard, so the next step of violation can be taken more easily and with less
resistance.
There is no way to know from what we
have seen so far, that there was any intent by those involved in this situation to go
further than simply the photographing of these unclothed children. But this much is
for certain. Monique, and those who played the role of enablers, have taken
exactly the same step which is common to pedophiles. They gathered children
together, and they asked them to undress. And they posed them before a camera.
And a photo was taken. And the children were comforted, and their concerns
allayed that this was something that is normal, to be undressed in public, and to be
photographed, and it is something for which they need not be afraid.
Is this the kind of memory you would want to impress
on the memory body of every child? No. Even if further desires for the violation of these
children have not yet reached the surface of the conscious mind in these individuals, clearly,
these memory records, in these children, are an open door for those who might come into
contact with them in the future, who do entertain those conscious desires. These memories,
which Monique has caused to be impressed upon these children, is an open door to future
exploitation. And such memories are not impressed upon the memory bodies of little children
by any benign force. That much is for sure.
This nexus demands that we not take any
chances, that we look more deeply, for the sake of the children, to see exactly what
has been, and yet may still be, going on here.
Now, the individuals involved here, may
argue that this is something that is perfectly normal, to gather young children
together, to ask them to undress, and to pose them before a camera, and then to
publish the image of their unclothed bodies on a website accessible to the general
public. But I have to tell you, that is one of the most grotesque lies, and absurdities
that we have yet heard within this particular community. I stand before all of my
brothers and sisters, and without uncertainty, or shame, I declare to you that there
is nothing at all normal about gathering children together, for the purpose of getting
them to undress, so they can be posed naked before a camera.
When we consider this assertion of normalcy,
this exposes yet another interesting nexus. Where exactly, and without any dispute,
is this considered "normal"? Pornographers generally, and child pornographers specifically,
do this every day. In terms of what you
would consider "normal" behavior, those who have an inordinate obsession with
sex are the only kinds of people that you would expect this kind of behavior from,
and that's a fact. It cannot be disputed.
I would, however, stipulate to the truth
of this observation, that indeed, there are lots of people who gather children
together to pose them for photos. This is a normal activity in many situations.
Family photos would be one example. Class photos would be another example.
Any place where children are gathered together in groups, there is usually a camera
around, still or video, and they are used to capture "the moment". And this it
totally innocent and totally normal. But in all of these cases, the children are never
asked to take their clothes off. The children are photographed with their clothes
on.
There is a line here that divides normality,
from abnormality. When you photograph children with their clothes on, that is normal.
When you make a conscious request that they take their clothes off before the photo can
be taken, that is where the photographer has crossed the line into abnormality.
And so, the line is crossed, from the
perfectly acceptable, as long as the parents have given their permission, to the
completely unacceptable regardless of whether the parents have given their
permission.
In this situation, in our community, which is
supposed to be ruled by Ascended Master standards, even if the parents gave their permission,
this represents a major corruption of our community standards when it comes to
protecting and safeguarding our children.
I have discussed, in the articles above, the
various ways in which this behavior does endanger children. I will not repeat that
material here.
And so, indeed, there is a very clear line of
common sense that divides the normal from the abnormal. And in this situation,
Monique, and those who participated in this, crossed that line.
What caused them to cross that line, from
the perfectly normal, to the totally unacceptable? The forces of darkness pushed
these people to do what they did. Those who have their minds meshed with the popular
culture, and its head-in-the-sand alternative to bright and open eyes, will no doubt look
back at you with a dull and mindless stare when we mention "forces of darkness". But
that is not the case in this community. We know that this is where corruption of the light
begins. We know that this is where the corruption of morals, and the corruption of standards
has its origin. And therefore, this is the more shocking in an organization where you sincerely
believe that the members understand this, and have invoked an appropriate amount of
protection as a result of their daily decree work. Obviously, these individuals had no
protection operating on that day, nor for the many weeks and months they allowed
those photos to displayed in public, potentially accessible as I have noted, to the
entire world-wide community of pedophiles.
I readily admit that it does not appear that
these children were overtly posed for sexual purposes, to display sex acts. But the
stage is set. When children are taught that they can safely discard their modesty,
in front of adults who are not members of their immediate family, they are one very large
step closer to that scenario where adults can take advantage of them in the worst way.
This is the clear danger in terms of the adults
who participated in this situation. This is simply a matter of common sense. If the
forces of darkness can push these adults past one set of barriers, asking children to
remove their cloths, and having the children cooperate in this, the forces of darkness
can just as easily push them past the next set of barriers. If some guardian action is
not taken, it is only a matter of time.
And where does the guardian action begin? It begins
by an admission of wrongdoing. If they do not admit to making a mistake, if they do not
repent, and if they do not receive and perform a penance, the future can be foretold. If they
spurn the spirit of contrition, that very denial exposes the presence of the dweller of pride, and
we know that it is pride that goeth before the fall.
What this means, is that these souls, who have stepped
into a downward spiral, and who are being slowly pulled into the abyss as we speak, absent
the presence of a contrite heart, will fall lower before they rise higher. And the fact that
we know they will fall lower, places a special responsibility upon us to make sure that the
children are not exposed to the greater danger associated with that process of falling. In other
words, as the adults around them fall deeper into the astral plane, and become less and less able
to differentiate the suggestions that emanate out of the pit, from the product of their own
minds, those who know better, and see the danger must act to protect the children.
And this forms the foundation of our
greatest concern. It is the fact that Monique and her enablers did not apologize, or
give any indication that they recognize that they have erred. Monique has made one
public statement on this issue, and that statement included an unmistakable spirit
of self-justification. In that statement, writing to another Keeper of the Flame, she
says, "I am sorry the picture offended you. When we posted the page in February we
actually received many emails from Keepers of the Flame around the world, saying they
enjoyed the visualization." That means that this dweller, which has access to innocent
children, which has been shown to be a danger to those children, is still intact, is still there.
And that means the danger to the children is still there.
Again, it is not normal to gather children
together to pose naked for a photograph of any kind. This represents a pedophile/pornography
nexus. We need to get to the bottom of this now, no pun intended, at least by me.
Perhaps that is what Monique is really asking the
community to do, by presenting the bottoms of these six children. Is it possible that this
represents a subconscious plea for help on the part of Monique? Is she saying, "Please help me
get to the bottom of this?" Clearly, her soul is saying exactly that.
We need a public investigation. Some
very straightforward questions need to be asked, and answered.
1. Did this idea originate with Monique? If not, who?
2. How was this arranged?
3. How did the children come to be in Monique's care?
4. How is Monique getting access to these children?
5. Who were the enablers?
6. Who are the parents? Both of the infant, and the older children?
7. Did the parents give their permission?
8. Did the parents participate in this?
9. Whose idea was it to put base adult language into the mouths of these children?
Who was the author of those words?
10. Who labored over the final graphic merging the images of the children against
the backdrop of the earth, and adding the text?
11. Who has possession of the original photos? They need to be surrendered. Do
these images still reside on the computer hard drives of the individuals involved? If
so they need to be erased.
12. Every person involved needs to be identified. They need to be counseled to
the point where they can see the folly of what they did. They need to be assigned a
penance. And that penance must be performed as a requirement to continue to be
associated with this community.
If it turns out that Monique did not
request the permission of the parents, then the organization has an outstanding legal
problem, and would be open to legal action right now, if the parents wanted to
pursue that. If the parents offered their permission, and helped to enable this whole
process, while the legal issue would evaporate, this would indicate a much deep
penetration into our community of the forces of darkness, which are behind any
example of child endangerment. As I pointed out
before, the darkness that can persuade a parent to disregard the safety of their own
child, is a much greater darkness than that required to persuade someone else to
disregard the safety of that child. So this needs to be pinned down, so we can
accurately assess the level of corruption our community has suffered.
These questions need to be asked and
answered.
As everyone is well aware, the Catholic
Church has been devastated by the encroachment of demons that have moved the
priests to molest the children. It is clear that this community is not immune to such
infiltration. At the first sign of a problem, we need to confront the issue forcefully,
get to the bottom of it, identify those individuals who have weaknesses in this
regard, and work with them to shore up the vulnerability. If they have no desire to
cooperate with the process of closing off this point of vulnerability, they must be
removed from this community. This must be done for the safety of the children.
We have the first sign of a problem in this
area. We must act to protect the children.
Let it be known, far and wide, and without
any doubt or uncertainty, that the safety of the children is this community's highest
priority.
The Downward Slide of the Culture
is Now Being Reproduced in the
Downward Slide of this Church
Denial and Complacency is the
order of the Day in Both
It was barely noticeable, just the other
day, when the U.S. Senate, not only refused to pass an amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, that would safeguard the institution of Marriage, but it was not even
allowed to come up for a debate, and a vote.
I feel like we can say, in relationship to
this, that on the third strike, you are out. In other words, when you get three good
pitches, and you let them all go by, or perhaps you swing and you miss, then you
are out.
I believe that this non-vote in the U.S. Senate, which
tested this nation's determination to protect the institution of marriage, is our third strike. Or
perhaps, taking into account what the law of mercy requires in terms of putting decision
processes into a certain finite framework of slow motion, it would probably be more accurate to
say that this represents the very beginning of our third swing at the third perfect pitch, and that
if our bat does not connect, it will, in the end, constitute our third strike. The trajectory of this
swing, even at the beginning, has all the hallmarks of a complete strikeout.
Did you know that the game of baseball was instituted
among men to provide appropriate and useful metaphors that could be harvested by (lower
case) messengers, to help them in their mission to bring profound commentary on life and
death issues before the people? This should not surprise you. The Earth is the Lord's, and the
fullness thereof.
When it comes to cultural watersheds, our
opportunity to swing at the ball is composed of time compartments which outplay
themselves in slow motion. In this regard, God our Father is merciful, and realistic. He
knows from experience that it takes us time to understand what is happening and more time
to decide what needs to be done, and more time to get off the couch to take the appropriate
action. In this sense, Time itself, is a manifestation of mercy. So, don't let anyone tell you that
it isn't real. Therefore, as his children confront each new corruption of the divine social order,
he will give us many opportunities to reverse it. Each opportunity represents just a few
degrees of one full swing at the ball. When the swing is complete, it will count as a strike,
if the bat does not connect with the ball for at least a base hit. We know that the swing is
complete, and that it was a strike, when the cultural setback has become a virtue in the
eyes of the people, and the arms of the batter have become weak, and limp, no longer
able to hold the bat, let alone swing it.
The parallel to this in the Summit Lighthouse
organization, is our total incapacity, thus far, to come to grips with this instance of child
endangerment. The ball has left the hand of the pitcher, and so far, no one has even picked up
the bat. This represents our third collective swing at the ball, and so far, the
trajectory of the swing looks like a strikeout.
It is important for a) the people of the United
States of America, and (b the members of the Summit Lighthouse community, to
understand that they are both facing their third swing at the ball, and that if they miss,
and the umpire calls "Strike Three" that they will be out. Now, when the batter understands
this, his attention will be far better focused as the ball comes closer and closer to the plate.
And there is an incentive built into the game even up to the very last moment of opportunity.
You see, even when you are facing the prospect of strike three, there is always the potential for
a home run even up to the very last instant.
And so, I am not surprised, when the batter looks at
me in a confused manner, and says, "Strike Three? What do you mean Strike Three? I don't
even remember Strike 1, or Strike 2, in fact, I don't even remember joining the team, coming
onto the field, and preparing for my day at bat. No, my mind is completely dazed with
confusion."
And so, as the ball approaches the plate for the third
time, we must conduct a little out door seminar, in the batter's box no less, and quickly. For
the pitcher has already released the ball from his hand.
I will speak to the American people first, with the
hope that I can help them remember what constituted strike 1, the swing and the miss, and
strike 2, the swing and the miss. The members of this organization should heed this, because if
America strikes out, it does not matter what the members of Summit Lighthouse do. The game
will be over. But then again, if the members of the Summit Lighthouse strike out themselves,
the American batter can only hope to stand at that plate blind, and confused, with
no hope at all of hitting the ball. And so, there is this very interesting symbiotic relationship
between these two batters.
Nevertheless, we will consider America's
performance, or lack thereof, at the plate first. Her first two strikes, and the third
now in progress, are as follows.
Pitch 1, Strike 1 - the banning of school prayer by the U.S.
Supreme Court in 1962, with the declaration of state laws providing for prayer in the public
schools as unconstitutional. The strike-out in regards to this pitch represents the failure by the
American people, over the course of 40 years, to overturn this Supreme Court decision,
allowing the public schools to become darker, and darker, and darker.
Pitch 2, Strike 2- the legalization of abortion by the U.S.
Supreme Court in 1973, with the declaration of state anti-abortion laws as unconstitutional.
The strike-out in regards to this pitch represents the failure by the American people, over the
course of 30 years, to overturn this Supreme Court decision, even as the death toll tallied into
the tens of millions.
Pitch 3, Strike 3- the legalization of homosexuality by
the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2003, with the declaration of state sodomy laws as
unconstitutional. This led quickly to the striking down of the Massachusetts Marriage laws,
which had heretofore restricted marriage to a union of a man and a woman, by the
Massachusetts State Supreme Court in November 2003. The current battle line, and defensive
perimeter has formed around the institution of marriage. The first attempt to pass an
amendment to the Constitution to safeguard marriage in July 2004, which failed, represents
another few degrees in the swing that will ultimately represent strike three in this area.
Now, I would ask you to please take a seat in my time
machine, and travel back with me to 1960, and take a look at what you see in the hearts and the
minds of the people in that day. In 1960, it would have been inconceivable that America would
ever see the day that school prayer would be banned, abortion legalized, homosexuality
legalized, and marriage itself challenged by homosexuals, and the people without the will to
defend it. If you would have stood on the corner of First Street and Broadway in Times Square,
and predicted that, someone would have handed you a straightjacket, and carted you off to an
insane asylum.
But, in 1962, school prayer was banned. And so, one
part of this inconceivable scenario, became an instant fact of life overnight. When it was
banned, the great majority of the people were shocked, and they objected. But an amendment
to the Constitution could not be passed. And 40 years later, a land without school prayer
appears to us to be a normal thing. And not only that. A whole host of activities, representing
the encroachment of the forces of darkness, which would have never been tolerated in our
schools in 1960, are accepted as perfectly normal today. For example, in 1960, those children
who were exposed to drugs and sex represented a tiny minority. Today, those children who are
not exposed to drugs and sex represent the tiny minority.
Please return to your seat in my time machine, and
let's go back to that very year, in the hot summer of 1962, and take a look at what you see in
the hearts and the minds of the people in that day. They are fuming mad about the Supreme
Court's decision to ban school prayer. But ask those same people, if they could conceive of
the day that abortion would be legalized, homosexuality legalized, and marriage challenged by
homosexuals, and left undefended, and they would have said no way. It can't happen here.
But, just eleven years later, In 1973, abortion was
legalized. And so, another part of this inconceivable scenario, became an instant fact of life
overnight. As the American people put on their pajamas one cold winter night in February of
1973, this was the world that they knew: abortion was outlawed in all 50 states of the union,
and it had never been any different. This was the way things were in America. The life of the
child in the womb was protected by laws in each of the 50 states. But, on the next day, when
they awoke, this is what they awoke to: they now lived in a nation wherein abortion was now
legal in all 50 states of the union. All laws, which heretofore had protected the unborn
throughout the entire nation had all been carted off to the nearest city dump (without a vote of
single state legislator). When abortion was legalized, the majority of the people objected. But
an amendment to the Constitution was not even attempted. And 30 years later, legal abortion
appears to be part of the normal way of life in America. But not only that. A whole host of
child related pathologies, which were practically unheard of in 1960, are now confronted on a
regular basis. For example, suicide among children, child molestation, child pornography, and
violence against children, being practically non-existent in 1960, is now a significant problem
in every community.
Please return to your seat in my time machine, and
let's go back to that very year, in the cold winter of 1973, and take a look at what you see in
the hearts and the minds of the people in that day. Again, most people are fuming mad about
the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the anti-abortion laws in every state. What is this
country coming to they ponder in their hearts. Many were interested in the fate of the children.
Many were interested in how laws perfectly reasonable throughout all the fifty states, could all
be canceled overnight by nine unelected, and unrecallable men, sitting on a court in
Washington D.C. The heart of our nation was ripped out on that day, and the people walked
into the future without it. But ask those same people, if they could
conceive of the day that homosexuality would be legalized, and marriage challenged by
homosexuals, and left undefended, and they would have said no way. It can't happen here.
But, just ten years later, in June 2003, homosexuality
was legalized. And so, the third and last part of this inconceivable scenario, became an instant
fact of life overnight. On that day, homosexual behavior became a constitutionally protected
right. Although, when this happened, very few people were shocked. It barely registered on the
minds of anyone. The capacity to be shocked, had long ago been shocked right out of the
American people.
Here, we don't even have to get into our time machine.
This is recent history. We can remember what the people were saying, and thinking. In this
regard, they couldn't fathom the impact of the decision, because homosexuals had been
winning the PR battle for many years. They had become "respected" entertainers, teachers,
policemen, businessmen, and even politicians. And so, it no longer seemed "normal" to
associate criminal sanctions with the upside down sexual behavior of otherwise "respectable"
people. Few, then, were surprised, and few objected. And the shoulders of a nation just
shrugged. But even so, if you would have asked those same people, and those people were
asked, it is part of the historical record, whether they could conceive of the day that marriage
would be challenged by homosexuals, and left undefended, they too would have said no way. It
can't happen here.
But just three months later, in November of 2003, as a
result of case brought by a homosexual couple, the Marriage Laws of the State of
Massachusetts were overturned, declared unconstitutional, by the Massachusetts Supreme
Court. And before anyone had the time to ponder the implications of this, that same court
mandated, in February 2004, the issuance of marriage licenses to homosexual couples in the
State of Massachusetts beginning in May 2004. That day came, and went, and we all saw the
unbelievable spectacle of marriage ceremonies being conducted between people of the same
sex. And so, finally, seeing the handwriting on the wall, an effort was made to quickly
introduce, in the U.S. Senate, an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would stop this
moral insanity from spreading any further. That effort to try to safeguard the very foundation
of civilization itself, was filibustered, and it died. There will be no amendment. And look
around. The number of people who care can be counted on one hand. Well, it is God's hand,
but still, it is only one hand.
Now, as we look back over our shoulder at this
landscape of missed opportunities, we see that after each Supreme Court ruling, people of
conscience object, but they can never rally enough support to reverse it, and as the decades
pass, the public becomes acclimated to the new situation. And because of the peculiar situation
of our two party system, the people can be polarized, some in support, and some in opposition,
and some who won't care one way or the other, and this stalemate, unanticipated by the
founding fathers, has been, and will be, an obstacle to restoring the operation of divine law in
our culture.
Honestly, in terms of America, the game
will be over, if we cannot get a base hit on this third pitch. If we strike out here, the
Divine Sponsorship which this nation has enjoyed since its inception, will be
withdrawn. I understand how huffy people can get when you postulate the theory
that homosexuals brought the AIDS virus down on their own heads. The Ascended
Masters however, are on record, telling us that this is true. Because of the misqualification
of the power of life itself, the immune system of these individuals was robbed of the
lifeforce that is required for it to function properly, allowing a virus, that was of no
danger to anyone before, to start taking lives by the tens of thousands. And I believe
it is fair to say, that as the virus was allowed full expression in the blood stream of
the most vulnerable, that genetic mutations occurred which produced a virus that
was more capable of attacking those with otherwise healthy immune systems,
accounting for the crossover into the heterosexual population, and the deadly effects
that it has had there as well.
In the acceptance of homosexual marriage, we
are moving into a much larger, and more expanded expression of the misqualification
of light. The energy invested by God our Father into the minds and emotions of the general
population were never intended to be woven into patterns of acceptance and justification of the
homosexual lifestyle. This represents a massive pollution and discoloration of the
mental, emotional, and spiritual energies of the entire population, not just a small, vocal,
and rebellious subset anymore. You see, what appears to be just a benign philosophy of
toleration, takes the filter of common sense off line. No longer does that filter keep the flow of
thoughts and feelings within the realm of moral realism. This is a philosophy of darkness that
turns all thoughts and feelings to dark side, progressively and gradually. Here we are speaking
of the compromise of the energies of light that are intended to provide functionality to our
collective immune systems, which are manifest in our social, educational, cultural, political,
and government institutions. As this immune system begins to collapse, we will see
corruptions of our collective life that have never before manifest on the ground of the United
States.
With the full adoption of homosexual marriage
throughout the United States, we will see the collapse of civilization as we know it. Now, I
understand that such conceptions of future destruction are very difficult to grasp and to focus
on. But think about this. Did homosexuals in the 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, and even the 1970's
ever imagine that their lifestyle would produce a vulnerability to a virus that would end up
killing nearly 30 million people by the end of 2004? No one could have ever imagined this
ever happening. But yet, it is a reality today. Roughly 8,500 people, around the world, die
every day from AIDS. So, when it comes to those who advocate the homosexual lifestyle, and
who harbor a sympathy with it, it is foolish to take their assurances at face value. Fool me
once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Everything they touch turns to death. If
they are allowed to touch the collective life of this nation in such a fundamental way, they will
transfer the quality of death to that.
Various factors that were once held in check by our
collective immune system up to this point, will no longer be held in check, and we will see the
dissolution of the social order on a scale unimaginable. At that point, we will not have the
cohesive power left in our institutions to regain control of our destiny. Chaos will be the result.
Chaos always leads to the institution of totalitarianism. The people will demand order, and
those who have the guns will provide it. Democracy, and the institutions of justice that go with
it, will be a thing of the past. At one point it will be clear, that the cancer of moral confusion
will have entered into too many parts of the body politic, and into them too deeply, for the
patient to be saved. The day that this was One Nation Under God, will be at an end. God our
Father will step aside, and allow us to gorge ourselves on the bitter fruit of our folly.
I just heard, on this very day, this
come out of the mouth of Tucker Carlson, the "conservative" host of CNN's crossfire.
"Everyone likes gays." Everyone just loves the odor that is peculiar to the rotting flesh of a
dying soul infested with the worms of rebellion. How is it possible to "like" people who
are contributing to the accelerated destruction of your society?
We can learn this from Tucker Carlson. It is clear
enough, that if you say anything approaching the truth about the consequences of the
homosexual lifestyle, if you say anything approaching the truth about the consequences of this
nation's complacent acceptance of this lifestyle, you will not be invited the dinner parties held
in the gorgeous houses of the power elite. And your "prospects" go down from there. And so,
the spines of once rationale people (like Tucker Carlson) are turned to mush as they quiver and
shake with the fearful prospect of being thought politically incorrect by those who stand guard
over the invitation lists.
The point is, that if you can stand back
upon that little piece of ground called 1960, and absorb the vision of the future the
people had in that day, and then compare and contrast it to the future that has actually
come to pass, a future that is all around us as we speak, you can grasp the magnitude of
moral corruption that has in fact steadily engulfed the nation. It is absolutely
monumental. If the people back then, in 1960, could have seen the future that was
to be, they would have doubled their efforts, and they would have never quit in
their efforts, to reverse every single moral corruption that reared its ugly head.
They never would have become complacent.
But the problem is, the people, generally speaking,
cannot "SEE" the future, at least not without the help of God. And because their first
priority has not been to seek that help, they have only the warnings of the prophets to
guide them, which unfortunately they look upon with the cynicism associated with the
blindness of the material mind. This is the dilemma faced in every generation.
And so, we are taught to retreat to the next defensible
perimeter, which is the bastion of principle, and from those walls, many bright cannon bursts of
illumination can be exploded above the heads of the people. And as they
marvel at the fire works, the glimmer of understanding can take hold in the minds of the
few, and patiently, we strive to kindle the great bonfire of truth that is to be, from these humble
beginnings.
Indeed, the future can be predicted, if you can
properly ascertain to what extent the people are being obedient to the laws of God in the
present. If they are being obedient, the future is bright. If they are being disobedient the future
will be dark. But, in the latter case, because many cling stubbornly to the hitching post of
disobedience, the people remain willfully blind to the perfectly predictable outcome associated
with their violation of the laws of God which they have made part and parcel of their lifestyles
in the present moment.
Of course it is true that you could have
predicted the end from the beginning when prayer was banned in the public schools in 1962.
But were people interested in hearing that prediction? No. Now they get to live in
the very midst of the predication they denied, which has yet come to pass according the law
that governs the decay and deceleration of consciousness untethered to the divine law.
What is the future of America after strike
three? That is the question for us now. Given our past experience, we should not be surprised
to find out that we are unable to form a clear picture of it. But at least we know what the
direction of the trend line will be. It will be down. It will be a fall of magnitude at least equal
to those falls that occurred in the aftermath of each of the succeeding pitches, and strikes.
The members of this community must see
themselves, their divine role and mission, juxtaposed to the great dilemma now faced
by this nation, America, which is on the verge of sliding into the abyss of social disintegration
just described. We are the only hope that there is. We are the only ones that can hold the line.
But we can only hold the line with light. And if we allow our organization to be absorbed into
the darkness of compromise, the Masters will not be able to anchor a sufficiency of light in us,
and therefore, no line of defense will manifest, there will be no Radiant Lighthouse to show the
way to the nation, and without the vision that only our Light can give the people, the people
will perish.
Note how each of the three strikes against
American culture were focused on the welfare of children. Robbing them first of
the contact with God through the practice of school prayer. Robbing them
secondly, of life itself, through the legalization of abortion. And for those who
manage to make it into embodiment, robbing them of the security of the family
unit, which is founded on the integrity of marriage. All of these represent attacks
against the child.
The Accelerated Ingestion
of the Three Strikes by the
Soul of the Summit Lighthouse
Once the Messenger stepped off the stage,
taking her protective radiance with her, the astral ocean began to pour into this
organization. And this great dark tide has carried with it the geometry of these three
strikes as described. And the threefold geometry of these three strikes have
outpictured itself very quickly, and this is because water levels tend to equalize
very rapidly. This is what the three pitches, and the strikes look like in our
organization.
Pitch 1, Strike 1 - The
performance of a Beatles tune on the Altar of the Holy
Grail, in King Arthur's Court during the high point of our most important
conference of the year, July 4, 2003 during the Freedom Conference. This
corresponds to the banning of school prayer in America, because it is direct attack
against the people's connection to God. The most holy tradition this nation had in 1960, in
terms of its collective life, was the practice of prayer in the public schools. The most holy thing
we have, in terms of our collective life in this community, is the central altar, the
Altar of the Holy Grail, in our Holy Sanctuary at King Arthur's Court. Therein burns the
central flame that illuminates the collective mind, and provides the basis for unity in our
community. These are parallels in terms of divine value and functionality in a collective sense.
To ban school prayer is to deny a whole category of divine intercession to the nation at large.
To desecrate our central Altar, is to deny a whole category of divine intercession to our
community at large. The evidence of this is clear enough. The people have set aside their
allegiance to divine principle, in exchange for an allegiance to rebellious personalities.
Moreover, in the same way that our schools were, and are, at the heart of the education of the
children of this nation, so too is the Altar of the Holy Grail at the heart of the education of the
children of our community. Corrupt the schools, and you corrupt a nation. Corrupt the central
altar, and you corrupt an entire community. The forces of darkness have convinced the
community to move on, and to accept this as a fait accompli. Seeing that there is no will
manifest to overturn it after 12 months, this represents Strike One.
Pitch 2, Strike 2 - The baseless, and mindless,
destruction of the unity of the Russian congregation, and the corresponding destruction of their
fabulously successful ascended master publishing operation in August of 2003. This act
parallels America's Pitch 2, Strike 2, 1973 legalization of abortion throughout the whole nation.
This infamous
act of the leadership in this situation, itself founded on shallow legalities, aborted the divine
plan of the master's mission in an entire country (Russia), aborted the divine plans of many
souls currently, and aborted the divine plan of untold thousands by denying them access to a
unified organization, and to the Teachings that would have otherwise been published and
distributed (in the Russian language) by these genuine lightbearers. Remember this statement
(Matt 7:2) concerning the outworking of the law of karma: " ... with what measure ye mete,
it shall be measured to you again." At best, the divine plan of this entire organization is on
hold, until this boomerang is defused. This means that for those members of this
organization who are complicit through support or silence in the commission of this abortion,
that their opportunity to make their ascension in this life has been canceled, pending the
adjudication of this crime. This is true for every American who complicit in the abortion of the
child in the womb, either through support or silence. It is equally true for every member of this
community who is complicit in this abortion.
Pitch 3, Strike 3 - The photographing and display
of the bodies of seven naked children on one of the most prominent church associated websites,
the "Darjeeling Report", and the subsequent total lack of action on the part of the leadership of
this organization to challenge these manifest examples of child endangerment, and their total
silence after the situation was fully exposed. This parallels, precisely, the Pitch 3, Strike
3, against America, in terms of the legalization of homosexuality, the demand for same sex
marriages, and the inability to safeguard the traditional definition of marriage in America.
This a perfect and precise parallel because they both share the central nexus of child
endangerment. Homosexuality extends from a base hatred for the male/female relationship
which exists only for one purpose, and that is to provide a platform for the conception and
raising of children. The homosexual rights movement has planted this lie in the minds of the
populace, that the intimate bonding between two individuals is not about children, that there are
other things of equal or greater importance than the needs of children. As this corrupting idea
penetrates deeper and deeper into the minds of what you would otherwise consider normal
families, the net effect is that non-children priorities will trump child priorities, and in this
way, the quality of child rearing throughout the entire culture is progressively degraded. The
move towards same-sex unions is just one more step in that direction, amplifying by an order
of magnitude, this lie that says marriage is not about children. As this matrix of child
endangerment is absorbed into the minds of the members of this community, you will see
examples of clear children endangerment, and you will see the acceptance of that child
endangerment, you will see this vulnerability to the lie that this is normal. And that is
exactly what we are seeing in the photographing of these seven children, without clothes,
for public consumption. Now, if it turns out to be true, that the parents of these seven children
gave permission to have their children photographed without clothes, and for those photos to be
published for public access on a church related website, then we would
have a much more dangerous illustration of this corruption of priorities that I am referring to.
In this situation, the propensity to entertain false and synthetic priorities, masquerading as
forms of righteousness in their minds, clearly took precedence over the needs and the safety of
these children.
(Why is the leadership tongue-tied on this issue? It is because of their loyalty to Monique
Gulick, the website publisher, a person whom they count as one of their most important
supporters, and defenders. In the above mentioned matter, in regards to the destruction of
the unity of the Russian congregation, when the leadership came under fierce attack after the
performance of what you could accurately term their second public abortion, who was it they
called to defend them in public? It was Monique Gulick.)
As you can see, the astral waters are rising quickly to a
level of equality with the surrounding astral ocean, and these three major points of corruption
are coming upon us in an accelerated manner.
This is the vibration that now emanates
from the Altar, and from this community at large: "Your Children are Not Safe Here." The
leadership allowed the children themselves to perform a rock song at the latest summer
conference. There are people in our midst who do not think twice about putting the children in
danger. And we have a community, generally, who are like those three monkeys, hear no evil,
see no evil, speak no evil.
It is Not Normal
Let us end, then, where we began. I am declaring, that it is
a most fantastic lie that is being foisted on the minds of the members of this community by
Monique Gulick, and the general silence of the central leadership, that it is somehow normal to
gather children together, and ask them to take off their clothes, so that they can be
photographed, and their nude bodies displayed for public consumption. This is not
normal.
I believe that the entire Spirit of the Great White
Brotherhood speaks with one voice in this respect. They all say, to a person, regarding
Monique's behavior in this area: "This is not normal."
Imagine your favorite
Master standing before you, and imagine these words coming out of his or her mouth, "This is
not normal." Imagine those words coming out of the mouth of the Master El Morya. Imagine
those words coming out of the mouth of the Master St. Germain. Imagine those words coming
out of the mouth of the Master Jesus Christ. Imagine those words coming out of the mouth of
Mother Mary. And ask yourself this question. Do those words seem in character, or out of
character? Would it seem totally appropriate for such words to come out of the mouths of these
Masters? Or would it seem odd to you to hear such words coming out of their mouths? And if
you have trouble visualizing this, then try imaging the opposite. Imagine these Masters saying,
that, in regards to the gathering together of children to have them photographed without their
clothes on, that, "This is normal." Hear them say that. "This is normal." Do these words
comport with what you know about the character of these masters, and how much interest you
know they have in guarding the safety of the children?
I believe that as you compare and contrast these two
opposing scenarios within your heart and soul, that the truth will become clear.
I am praying that the great majority of members can
grasp this fact with their hearts, that every single ascended master in heaven, every member of
the Darjeeling Council, every member of the Indian Council of the Great White Brotherhood,
every member of the Council of the Royal Teton, each one of the seven Archangels, Michael,
Jophiel, Chamuel, Gabriel, Raphael, Uriel, and Zadkiel, and all the Angel Devas of the nature
kingdoms, worlds without end, and every member of every cosmic council throughout the
entire universe, that they all speak with one voice on this issue, "This is not normal".
And given this fact, given this absolute unanimity
throughout the entire body of God on this issue, then you can understand the depth of darkness
that had a hold of these individuals who were responsible for this, and which yet holds them in
its grip, in as much as there is no sign of repentance or contrition. This darkness is so great,
and
so seamless, that an infinity of brilliant minds could not penetrate it. In other words, the free
will had so seamlessly identified with the dark side, at least at that moment in time, that not a
single Master in heaven was allowed to send a ray of illumination across that line to break that
spell.
And as we are able to grasp the extent of this darkness
which allowed these children to be endangered in the first place, understanding that the
darkness is still extent, we know that the children are in danger yet. And so the lie is sent
abroad by the forces of darkness, to persuade us, by any means, to maintain this status quo.
On this little sliver of ground, they are winning, and
they intend to defend what they have gained.
Indeed, the forces of darkness have set yet another
great lie before us, to accomplish this purpose, and they have asked us again to swallow it. But
this time we say, No, we will not swallow this one. No, we are not going to follow these fallen
angels into the abyss, no, not this time. We will not allow our souls to become filled with the
dead weight of their infamy, hatred, and blasphemy. No, not this time. This time, we will
speak the truth back into the very teeth of this lie, and we say, with one voice, it is not normal
to gather children together, and ask them to take their clothes off, so that they can be
photographed, and their bodies set before the public for their consumption. No, this is not
normal. And we will get to the bottom of this. We will act now in the manner best conceived
to safeguard the children from the predators in their midst.
But the members of this community should not be
confused on this point by an artificial limitation of our perspective. Let our understanding take
in as much as the causative context that the mind can possibly hold.
This additional lie comes at us, and we are vulnerable
to it, only because a much deeper shadow had already been cast across the collective mind of
this organization. And that is the lie that Rev. Linda Worobec foisted upon us, when, with
premeditation, planned a performance that included a Beatles tune, executed that performance,
and then justified it, forcing us to swallow this ridiculous idea that a true chela of El Morya
could have done that, or even supported her in doing that. What a gross lie. At the time these
individuals executed that infamy, they exposed themselves for exactly who they are. They are
fallen angels, who harbor hatred for God and his purposes in their hearts, and they occupy these
positions of power in this church for one reason, and that is to destroy from within what they
would have never been able to destroy from without.
And if that original desecration of our Central Holy
Altar was not enough to shock us into a realization of the truth (regarding their real identity,
and their real agenda), they acted it out for us in technicolor, actually participating in an orgy
of internal organizational destruction right in front of our very eyes, when they destroyed the
unity of the Russian congregation, and destroyed that ascended master publishing operation.
Again, they pried open our little mouths with a crowbar of intimidation and hubris, and we
swallowed that lie again, that true chelas of El Morya could have been involved in such a
catastrophe. Another outlandish and audacious lie. They are fallen angels, who harbor hatred
for God and his purposes in their hearts, and they occupy these positions of power in this
church for one reason, and that is to destroy from within what they would have never been able
to destroy from without.
And now we see them stand by and allow the
desecration of not just the altar, but of little children. They are silent in the face of this
desecration, and when challenged they remain silent still. They have no love for the child, for
they have murdered the Christ child within themselves long ago, and they have the blood of
many more on their swords, which they lick clean before they lay their heads down on their
comfortable little pillows, paid for by the tithes of the members of this organization.
How has it come to pass that fallen angels are actually
among us, and masquerading as our very leaders? How in the world did this ever happen? I
will explain it. Let confusion in this issue area be cast out now, and forever.
This was their last chance. Perhaps you can say that
these were the cream of the crop, when it comes to fallen angels. The possibility for
redemption, it appears, was a real possibility for them. Though in all reality, I am sure that
victory was a longshot, because of the huge weight of betrayal of the living Christ that they
carry in their electronic belts. But the law required this last chance, as we have been taught,
and they were given every possible advantage.
They were given an unprecedented opportunity to
balance great swaths of karma by helping the Masters, under the strict supervision of the
Messenger, to help get their a Teaching out to a world. How merciful God is to allow the Light
evoked thereby, by humble souls who genuinely ate up the teaching, to the last crumb, to count
for the balancing of their past karma of betrayal.
They were given every advantage, including access to
the central light of the Altar, to the Messenger, and talents galore, and a treasure chest of real
relationships with real lightbearers, all for a purpose, that this might elicit in them a flicker of
gratitude unto God himself. Just a flicker of genuine gratitude that the Masters could fan into a
conflagration of freedom's fires.
But no, that was not to be, because, you see,
everything they have, they deserve. They are not thankful to anyone. They earned it. And by
God, they are going to hold onto it.
And finally the day would come, and we would see
how they would use their opportunity, their last opportunity. Would they use it, as they had
been taught by Lucifer
himself, to adorn the ego, and its agenda of power accumulation? Or would they use this
opportunity to surrender that ego, surrender that pride, and humble themselves before the law,
for the Glory of God's Purposes? They have made their choice.
You can see that choice in the wreckage they have at
their feet. Rather than allowing the Christ to be resurrected in them, they have
resurrected the Spirit of Betrayal. They are now the King of the Mountain, and from their
perch, they spit again into the Master's eye, as they see themselves as the key to the salvation
of the planet. They are the great generals now. And everyone must bow down to them.
Their test came, and they failed it. Miserably. Their
time is up. They have been given more opportunity then they ever deserved. Now, the reaper
has come, and they will be cast out. The only question is, how many otherwise redeemable
children will they succeed in sweeping up into their vortex of rebellion and death? It has
happened before. Many yet cling and suckle upon their boot laces. Not a good choice.
Each of these three issues, these pitches, and these
strikes, are dividing lines. As the members of this organization choose which side of the line
they feel most comfortable on, the Masters will use that choice in determining who can be
extracted from this vortex of rebellion, and who cannot be extracted. Those who cannot be
extracted, these will be cast out with these fallen angels.
Every succeeding generation of lightbearers must face
these tests, because every generation has its association, and its allegiances, to a certain class of
fallen angels who must be given their last opportunities as well. Therefore, let the traditions
be established here and now, that will allow these individuals to be quickly identified and cast
out, when they prove their true colors. Let us establish those traditions of identification, and
adjudication, that can stop them from causing such large scale destruction before their time is
actually up. If we can do this, we will be making the path ahead for millions, much straighter
than it would otherwise be. Clearly, if we had nipped this situation in the bud on July 4, 2003,
none of these other destructive consequences would have ever manifested.
The Blueprint of the Soul
The blueprint of the soul is composed of many universal
laws. The central spine in this regard is the Golden Rule, upon which the unique attributes of
each lifestream are hung, even like unto the flesh of the body. Without this central spine there
is no structure at all to the form. And when considering the body of consciousness which the
soul is meant to be, without this central spine, no body can coalesce, let alone produce that
fragrance of victory known as self-awareness in God.
And this tells us something about the far reaching
negative consequences associated with the rebellion of leadership. For they have set before us
an example of the repudiation of the Golden Rule, three times three. Each of the three strikes
listed above, represents a fundamental rejection of the Golden Rule, a rejection of the law, that
these leaders would have us accept as normal behavior for ascended master students.
And as the membership accepts this repudiation, as the
membership accepts the example thereof, they ingest a certain fundamental geometry of
darkness that opposes the assimilation of the Golden Rule into their own self awareness. And
henceforth, this essential capacity to draw unto themselves the skeins of light that would allow
the rebuilding of the whole divine blueprint, is stolen from them, for the most basic inner
skeleton will not form, leaving nothing upon which to attach and anchor the more refined
elements of the law, which comprises the flesh of their own divine identity.
In this way, the rebellion of leadership can bring the
Godward evolution of an entire lifewave to a halt.
To reverse this ingestion, one must repudiate, openly,
and forcefully, the rebellion of the leadership.
Therefore, let the public investigation begin in this
matter of child endangerment in and around the Minneapolis Teaching Center. And let their
inaction on this score be a double validation of their true identity.
And let every true lightbearer hold in his or her mind
this last jewel of truth on this issue.
When it comes time for cosmic councils to decide
whether your soul has met the requirements for the ascension or not, they will look in your
folder, and they will be looking for one letter. Over and above everything else that must be in
that folder, testifying to your mastery of the fundamental aspects of the path, and the balancing
of your karma generally to the required level, there must be one additional letter in that folder.
And if it is not there, no matter what else is in that folder, if this letter is not there, you will not
be allowed to proceed with the ritual of the ascension. You must write a letter to the Board of
Directors of this church demanding a public investigation of this matter of child endangerment
at the Minneapolis Teaching Center. Your voice must be heard, and it must be heard now. If
you decide to remain silent, you have sealed your own fate by that silence.
Now, given the fact that 99% of the membership will
actually feel a great hesitation when it comes to writing that letter, tell me again, how
insignificant you believe it was, that our Church Manager, Rev. Linda Worobec performed a
Beatles tune on the Altar of the Holy Grail on July 4, 2003. See if you can continue to convince
yourself of the insignificance of that desecration, and the leadership's support of it, at the same
time as you consider the great shadow of ignorance that has fallen over the membership as a
result thereof, and how that darkness tugs at your mind and emotional body, and that of the
entire membership, even at this moment, leaving you, and them nearly incapacitated when it
comes to understanding what the need of the hour is, even though I have set it before you as
plain as the noon day sun.
Yes, consider the insignificance of it, as you
contemplate how the organization as a whole sits today on the razor's edge, the ascension of
every member thereof in doubt, and the destiny of this entire nation, for the reasons stated
above, in even a deeper shadow of doubt.
Emails are not appropriate in a situation like this. A
traditional letter written upon a clean sheet of paper is required. This is the address to which
you must send your letter:
The Honorable
Board of Directors,
The Summit Lighthouse, and
Church Universal and Triumphant,
PO Box 5000, Corwin Springs, MT
59030-5000 USA
|